- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Predator GD712 vs QT12
Acer Predator GD712 vs Acer QT12
What Predator GD712 does better (5) and where QT12 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
5.8Picture6.8
Why is Predator GD712 better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Light source life20,000 h vs 6,500 h3.1×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Audio outputYes · QT12: No
Why is QT12 better than Predator GD712?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,600 lm vs 6,500 lm4.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,600 lm | 6,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,500,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.22:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.7 m | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 143 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 6,500 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 26 dB | — |
| Weight | 3.2 kg | — |
| Width | 320 mm | — |
| Height | 109 mm | — |
| Depth | 232 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
