- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF16ATV vs Photon Life PH31
Acer QF16ATV vs Optoma Photon Life PH31
What QF16ATV does better (2) and where Photon Life PH31 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Picture3.1
6.5Setup & placement2.1
Why is QF16ATV better than Photon Life PH31?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Largest image size300″ vs 150″2×
Why is Photon Life PH31 better than QF16ATV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm vs 1,500 lm2.7×
- Weight3.15 kg vs 2.2 kg+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 550 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 400:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.5:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.65:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.32 m |
| Smallest image size | 72″ | 60″ |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 150″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.1× |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 32 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 16 dB | 30 dB |
| Weight | 3.15 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Width | 178 mm | — |
| Height | 257 mm | — |
| Depth | 192 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
