- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF16ATV vs FLIK HD9
Acer QF16ATV vs Kodak FLIK HD9
What QF16ATV does better (2) and where FLIK HD9 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is QF16ATV better than FLIK HD9?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm vs 200 lm2.8×
- Largest image size300″ vs 150″2×
Why is FLIK HD9 better than QF16ATV?
FLIK HD9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 550 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 800:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 72″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 150″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 16 dB | — |
| Weight | 3.15 kg | — |
| Width | 178 mm | — |
| Height | 257 mm | — |
| Depth | 192 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
