- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Sl2520N vs NEBULA
Acer Sl2520N vs Nebula NEBULA
What Sl2520N does better (4) and where NEBULA wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is Sl2520N better than NEBULA?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 1,500 lm2.7×
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life20,000 h vs 1,500 h13.3×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Why is NEBULA better than Sl2520N?
NEBULA has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,500:1 |
| HDR support | No | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 0.5:1 | — |
| Throw type | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 1.11 m | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | — |
| USB port | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | Yes | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 1,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | — |
| Width | — | 183 mm |
| Height | — | 230 mm |
| Depth | — | 204 mm |
| Colours | White | Grey, Black |
