- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs Sl2520N
Acer QT12 vs Acer Sl2520N
What QT12 does better (1) and where Sl2520N wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than Sl2520N?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 4,000 lm+62%
Why is Sl2520N better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · QT12: Yes
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 4,000 lm |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.5:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.11 m |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 29 dB |
| Colours | White | White |
