How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Fire Legend QF15a vs FLIK X10

AOpen Fire Legend QF15a vs Kodak FLIK X10

What Fire Legend QF15a does better (3) and where FLIK X10 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AOpen Fire Legend QF15a
AOpen · 2024Fire Legend QF15a
3.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
vs
Kodak FLIK X10
Kodak · 2025FLIK X10
2 advantages≈ US$240
2.2Setup & placement5.2

Why is Fire Legend QF15a better than FLIK X10?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  2. Audio outputYes · FLIK X10: No
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 800:1+25%

Why is FLIK X10 better than Fire Legend QF15a?

  1. AutofocusNo · Fire Legend QF15a: Yes
  2. Largest image size100″ vs 120″+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak FLIK X10Kodak FLIK X10≈ US$240
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—3,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1800:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.3:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m2.88 m
Smallest image size56″40″
Largest image size100″120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption65 W—
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise37 dB—
Weight2.1 kg—
Width130 mm—
Height218 mm—
Depth215 mm—
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare