- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- FLIK X10 vs NeoPix 250
Kodak FLIK X10 vs Philips NeoPix 250
What FLIK X10 does better (0) and where NeoPix 250 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is FLIK X10 better than NeoPix 250?
FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 250 better than FLIK X10?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:1 vs 3,000:13.8×
- Largest image size120″ vs 200″+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| 4K method | — | 4K input only (downscaled) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 250 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 3,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 800:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.3:1 | 1.31:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.88 m | 2.9 m |
| Smallest image size | 40″ | 80″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 2.5 kg |
| Width | — | 239 mm |
| Height | — | 188 mm |
| Depth | — | 141 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
