How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Fire Legend QH12A vs NeoPix 100

AOpen Fire Legend QH12A vs Philips NeoPix 100

What Fire Legend QH12A does better (4) and where NeoPix 100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AOpen Fire Legend QH12A
AOpen · 2024Fire Legend QH12A
3.8Score
4 advantages≈ US$120
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 100
Philips · 2024NeoPix 100
2 advantages≈ US$85
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fire Legend QH12ANeoPix 100
140 × 153144158 × 20578
Fire Legend QH12ANeoPix 100Difference
Height153 mm205 mm−52 mm
Width140 mm158 mm−18 mm
Depth144 mm78 mm+66 mm
Weight1 kg0.8 kg+0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fire Legend QH12A better than NeoPix 100?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 6 W+67%
  3. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  4. Largest image size100″ vs 65″+54%

Why is NeoPix 100 better than Fire Legend QH12A?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
  2. Weight0.95 kg vs 0.8 kg+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)135 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.47:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m3.25 m
Largest image size100″65″
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W6 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Weight0.95 kg0.8 kg
Width140 mm158 mm
Height153 mm205 mm
Depth144 mm78 mm
ColoursBlue, BlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare