- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 100 vs PT-1
Philips NeoPix 100 vs Rollei PT-1
What NeoPix 100 does better (2) and where PT-1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is NeoPix 100 better than PT-1?
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 5 W+20%
- Weight0.8 kg vs 1.5 kg+88%
Why is PT-1 better than NeoPix 100?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Largest image size65″ vs 200″3.1×
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 5,000:1+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 220 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 5,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | 1.44:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | 3.19 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Width | 158 mm | — |
| Height | 205 mm | — |
| Depth | 78 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Grey |
