- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PV11 vs IR150WF
AOpen PV11 vs Irradio IR150WF
What PV11 does better (2) and where IR150WF wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is PV11 better than IR150WF?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 2,000 h10×
- Audio outputYes · IR150WF: No
Why is IR150WF better than PV11?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm vs 150 lm+50%
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 2,000:12×
- Largest image size100″ vs 170″+70%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 100 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.3:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.88 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 170″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 2 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 40 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 2,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.4 kg | — |
| Width | 114 mm | — |
| Height | 40 mm | — |
| Depth | 114 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
