How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Crusader Challenger IN3008SL vs IR150WF

InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SL vs Irradio IR150WF

What Crusader Challenger IN3008SL does better (3) and where IR150WF wins (1) — every spec side by side.

InFocus Crusader Challenger IN3008SL
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$310
Higher score
vs
Irradio IR150WF
Irradio · 2024IR150WF
1 advantage≈ US$250
6.3Picture3.7

Why is Crusader Challenger IN3008SL better than IR150WF?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm vs 150 lm2.3×
  2. Light source life25,000 h vs 2,000 h12.5×
  3. Audio outputYes · IR150WF: No

Why is IR150WF better than Crusader Challenger IN3008SL?

  1. Largest image size130″ vs 170″+31%
Specifications

Side by side

Irradio IR150WFIrradio IR150WF≈ US$250
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)350 lm150 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—2,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Smallest image size45″—
Largest image size130″170″
Lens shiftNone—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-inYes—
Internal storage32 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Light source life25,000 h2,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)28 dB—
Weight1.3 kg—
Width147 mm—
Height128 mm—
Depth130 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare