- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF12 vs BW-V5
AOpen QF12 vs BlitzWolf BW-V5
What QF12 does better (2) and where BW-V5 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
QF12BW-V5
| QF12 | BW-V5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 92 mm | 93 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 232 mm | 220 mm | +12 mm |
| Depth | 168 mm | 190 mm | −22 mm |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 1.2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is QF12 better than BW-V5?
- Fan noise33 dB vs 44 dB+33%
- Wi-FiYes · BW-V5: No
Why is BW-V5 better than QF12?
- Largest image size150″ vs 170″+13%
- Weight1.3 kg vs 1.2 kg+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 100 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 3,800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.3:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.88 m | — |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 170″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 65 W | — |
| Light source life | 50,000 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 33 dB | 44 dB |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 1.2 kg |
| Width | 232 mm | 220 mm |
| Height | 92 mm | 93 mm |
| Depth | 168 mm | 190 mm |
| Colours | White, Gold | White |
