How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QF12 vs 58BHD2500

AOpen QF12 vs Salora 58BHD2500

What QF12 does better (1) and where 58BHD2500 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

AOpen QF12
AOpen · 2021QF12
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$160
Higher score
vs
Salora 58BHD2500
Salora · 201958BHD2500
4 advantages≈ US$190
5.7Noise, lifetime & portability9.8

Why is QF12 better than 58BHD2500?

  1. Audio outputYes · 58BHD2500: No

Why is 58BHD2500 better than QF12?

  1. Fan noise33 dB vs 25 dB+32%
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 1,500:1+50%
  4. Largest image size150″ vs 200″+33%
Specifications

Side by side

AOpen QF12AOpen QF12≈ US$1604.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—2,500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:11,500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.3:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.88 m—
Smallest image size—50″
Largest image size150″200″
Lens shiftNone—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption65 W—
Light source life50,000 h50,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise33 dB25 dB
Weight1.3 kg—
Width232 mm—
Height92 mm—
Depth168 mm—
ColoursWhite, GoldWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare