- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ML1050ST+ vs 58BHD2500
Optoma ML1050ST+ vs Salora 58BHD2500
What ML1050ST+ does better (3) and where 58BHD2500 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is ML1050ST+ better than 58BHD2500?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1 vs 1,500:113.3×
- Audio outputYes · 58BHD2500: No
- Fan noise22 dB vs 25 dB+14%
Why is 58BHD2500 better than ML1050ST+?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 800 (WXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life20,000 h vs 50,000 h2.5×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 800 (WXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Largest image size100″ vs 200″2×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 2,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 20,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| HDR support | No | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 85 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 0.8:1 | — |
| Throw type | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 1.77 m | — |
| Smallest image size | — | 50″ |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 77 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 22 dB | 25 dB |
| Weight | 0.42 kg | — |
| Width | 112 mm | — |
| Height | 57 mm | — |
| Depth | 123 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White |
