How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QF18s vs Cube 600

AOpen QF18s vs BladeCine Cube 600

What QF18s does better (1) and where Cube 600 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

AOpen QF18s
AOpen · 2024QF18s
9.2Score
1 advantage≈ US$240
vs
BladeCine Cube 600
BladeCine · 2025Cube 600
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$200
Higher score
9.3Picture8.2
6.8Setup & placement9.1

Why is QF18s better than Cube 600?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)800 lm vs 600 lm+33%

Why is Cube 600 better than QF18s?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · QF18s: Yes
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 20 W2×
  3. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  4. Largest image size120″ vs 200″+67%
Specifications

Side by side

AOpen QF18sAOpen QF18s≈ US$2409.2
BladeCine Cube 600BladeCine Cube 600≈ US$2009.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)800 lm600 lm
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.23:11.39:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.72 m3.08 m
Smallest image size55″50″
Largest image size120″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W20 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Weight—3.5 kg
Width—272 mm
Height—241 mm
Depth—187 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare