- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF18s vs NeoPix Ultra One
AOpen QF18s vs Philips NeoPix Ultra One
What QF18s does better (3) and where NeoPix Ultra One wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Setup & placement2.1
Why is QF18s better than NeoPix Ultra One?
- AutofocusYes · NeoPix Ultra One: No
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix Ultra One: No
- Largest image size120″ vs 65″+85%
Why is NeoPix Ultra One better than QF18s?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 800 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.23:1 | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.72 m | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | 55″ | — |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 100 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.2 kg |
| Width | — | 220 mm |
| Height | — | 90 mm |
| Depth | — | 170 mm |
| Colours | Black | Silver, Black |
