- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF23s vs NeoPix 256
AOpen QF23s vs Philips NeoPix 256
What QF23s does better (1) and where NeoPix 256 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
5.2Picture5.2
Why is QF23s better than NeoPix 256?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 1,000 h30×
Why is NeoPix 256 better than QF23s?
NeoPix 256 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 250 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 40″ | — |
| Largest image size | 120″ | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 1,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | — | White, Silver, Grey |
