- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZenBeam E2 vs NeoPix 120
Asus ZenBeam E2 vs Philips NeoPix 120
What ZenBeam E2 does better (2) and where NeoPix 120 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Setup & placement2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
ZenBeam E2NeoPix 120
| ZenBeam E2 | NeoPix 120 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 39 mm | 102 mm | −63 mm |
| Width | 110 mm | 225 mm | −115 mm |
| Depth | 107 mm | 190 mm | −83 mm |
| Weight | 0.4 kg | 0.8 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ZenBeam E2 better than NeoPix 120?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix 120: No
- Weight0.4 kg vs 0.85 kg2.1×
Why is NeoPix 120 better than ZenBeam E2?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.25 m |
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | — | 42 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.4 kg | 0.85 kg |
| Width | 110 mm | 225 mm |
| Height | 39 mm | 102 mm |
| Depth | 107 mm | 190 mm |
| Colours | Gold | Black |
