How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZenBeam E2 vs NeoPix 320

Asus ZenBeam E2 vs Philips NeoPix 320

What ZenBeam E2 does better (2) and where NeoPix 320 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Asus ZenBeam E2
Asus · 2022ZenBeam E2
2 advantages≈ US$320
vs
Philips NeoPix 320
Philips · 2022NeoPix 320
7.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$410
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

ZenBeam E2NeoPix 320
110 × 39107216 × 93246
ZenBeam E2NeoPix 320Difference
Height39 mm93 mm−54 mm
Width110 mm216 mm−106 mm
Depth107 mm246 mm−139 mm
Weight0.4 kg1.2 kg−0.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ZenBeam E2 better than NeoPix 320?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  2. Weight0.4 kg vs 1.2 kg3×

Why is NeoPix 320 better than ZenBeam E2?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
  3. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ZenBeam E2Asus ZenBeam E2≈ US$320
Philips NeoPix 320Philips NeoPix 320≈ US$4107.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.4:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.1 m
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.4 kg1.2 kg
Width110 mm216 mm
Height39 mm93 mm
Depth107 mm246 mm
ColoursGoldBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare