How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZenBeam E2 vs NeoPix Ultra One

Asus ZenBeam E2 vs Philips NeoPix Ultra One

What ZenBeam E2 does better (2) and where NeoPix Ultra One wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus ZenBeam E2
Asus · 2022ZenBeam E2
2 advantages≈ US$320
vs
Philips NeoPix Ultra One
Philips · 2022NeoPix Ultra One
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$210
Higher score
8.2Setup & placement2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

ZenBeam E2NeoPix Ultra One
110 × 39107220 × 90170
ZenBeam E2NeoPix Ultra OneDifference
Height39 mm90 mm−51 mm
Width110 mm220 mm−110 mm
Depth107 mm170 mm−63 mm
Weight0.4 kg1.2 kg−0.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ZenBeam E2 better than NeoPix Ultra One?

  1. Weight0.4 kg vs 1.2 kg3×
  2. Wi-FiYes · NeoPix Ultra One: No

Why is NeoPix Ultra One better than ZenBeam E2?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
  3. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  4. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ZenBeam E2Asus ZenBeam E2≈ US$320
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.4:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.1 m
Largest image size—65″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesNo
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.4 kg1.2 kg
Width110 mm220 mm
Height39 mm90 mm
Depth107 mm170 mm
ColoursGoldSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare