How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZenBeam E2 vs NeoPix Ultra One+

Asus ZenBeam E2 vs Philips NeoPix Ultra One+

What ZenBeam E2 does better (1) and where NeoPix Ultra One+ wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Asus ZenBeam E2
Asus · 2022ZenBeam E2
1 advantage≈ US$320
vs
Philips NeoPix Ultra One+
Philips · 2022NeoPix Ultra One+
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$290
Higher score
8.2Setup & placement2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

ZenBeam E2NeoPix Ultra One+
110 × 39107220 × 90170
ZenBeam E2NeoPix Ultra One+Difference
Height39 mm90 mm−51 mm
Width110 mm220 mm−110 mm
Depth107 mm170 mm−63 mm
Weight0.4 kg1.2 kg−0.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ZenBeam E2 better than NeoPix Ultra One+?

  1. Weight0.4 kg vs 1.2 kg3×

Why is NeoPix Ultra One+ better than ZenBeam E2?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
  3. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ZenBeam E2Asus ZenBeam E2≈ US$320
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.4:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.1 m
Largest image size—80″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.4 kg1.2 kg
Width110 mm220 mm
Height39 mm90 mm
Depth107 mm170 mm
ColoursGoldSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare