- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZenBeam E2 vs PicoPix Micro+
Asus ZenBeam E2 vs Philips PicoPix Micro+
What ZenBeam E2 does better (1) and where PicoPix Micro+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
ZenBeam E2PicoPix Micro+
| ZenBeam E2 | PicoPix Micro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 39 mm | 34 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 110 mm | 76 mm | +34 mm |
| Depth | 107 mm | 74 mm | +33 mm |
| Weight | 0.4 kg | 0.2 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ZenBeam E2 better than PicoPix Micro+?
- Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 3 W+67%
Why is PicoPix Micro+ better than ZenBeam E2?
- Weight0.4 kg vs 0.21 kg+90%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 600:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | — | 70″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Own / Linux platform |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.4 kg | 0.21 kg |
| Width | 110 mm | 76 mm |
| Height | 39 mm | 34 mm |
| Depth | 107 mm | 74 mm |
| Colours | Gold | Black |
