How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. BOOM Air vs NeoPix 160

Aurzen BOOM Air vs Philips NeoPix 160

What BOOM Air does better (2) and where NeoPix 160 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen BOOM Air
Aurzen · 2025BOOM Air
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$300
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 160
Philips · 2025NeoPix 160
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$190
2.8Picture2.4
5.1Smart features & sound2.4

Why is BOOM Air better than NeoPix 160?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 5 W2×
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)300 lm vs 250 lm+20%

Why is NeoPix 160 better than BOOM Air?

  1. Audio outputNo · BOOM Air: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen BOOM AirAurzen BOOM Air≈ US$3006.7
Philips NeoPix 160Philips NeoPix 160≈ US$1903.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)300 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)500:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.28:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.83 m—
Largest image size200″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W5 W
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital PlusYes—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TVGoogle TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)YesYes
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-inYesYes
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
USB-C power input (power bank)Yes—
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise26 dB—
Weight1.23 kg1.23 kg
Width—207 mm
Height—147 mm
Depth—171 mm
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare