How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. FLIK X10 vs NeoPix 160

Kodak FLIK X10 vs Philips NeoPix 160

What FLIK X10 does better (0) and where NeoPix 160 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kodak FLIK X10
Kodak · 2025FLIK X10
0 advantages≈ US$240
vs
Philips NeoPix 160
Philips · 2025NeoPix 160
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score

Why is FLIK X10 better than NeoPix 160?

FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix 160 better than FLIK X10?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  2. Audio outputNo · FLIK X10: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Kodak FLIK X10Kodak FLIK X10≈ US$240
Philips NeoPix 160Philips NeoPix 160≈ US$1903.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—250 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)3,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)800:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.3:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.88 m—
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size120″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—5 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—1.23 kg
Width—207 mm
Height—147 mm
Depth—171 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare