- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- E1R vs NeoPix 140
Aurzen E1R vs Philips NeoPix 140
What E1R does better (4) and where NeoPix 140 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Picture2.4
6.8Setup & placement2.1
Why is E1R better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
- AutofocusYes · NeoPix 140: No
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
- Largest image size120″ vs 65″+85%
Why is NeoPix 140 better than E1R?
- Audio outputNo · E1R: Yes
- Weight0.45 kg vs 0.3 kg+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.1:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.44 m | — |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.3 kg |
| Width | — | 68 mm |
| Height | — | 142 mm |
| Depth | — | 74 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
