- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EAZZE D1 vs NeoPix 150
Aurzen EAZZE D1 vs Philips NeoPix 150
What EAZZE D1 does better (3) and where NeoPix 150 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Picture2.2
Why is EAZZE D1 better than NeoPix 150?
- Built-in speakers (total output)16 W vs 6 W2.7×
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix 150: No
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,200:1 vs 1,000:1+20%
Why is NeoPix 150 better than EAZZE D1?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 250 lm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K input only (downscaled) | — |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,200:1 | 1,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 50″ | — |
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Automatic screen fit | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 16 W | 6 W |
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 37 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 1.85 kg |
| Width | — | 126 mm |
| Height | — | 208 mm |
| Depth | — | 144 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
