- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EAZZE D1R Air vs NeoPix Ultra One
Aurzen EAZZE D1R Air vs Philips NeoPix Ultra One
What EAZZE D1R Air does better (4) and where NeoPix Ultra One wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Setup & placement2.1
Why is EAZZE D1R Air better than NeoPix Ultra One?
- AutofocusYes · NeoPix Ultra One: No
- Largest image size150″ vs 65″2.3×
- Wi-FiYes · NeoPix Ultra One: No
- Power consumption94 W vs 100 W+6%
Why is NeoPix Ultra One better than EAZZE D1R Air?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 300 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | 40″ | — |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 10 W |
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Own / Linux platform | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| USB-C power input (power bank) | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 94 W | 100 W |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.2 kg |
| Width | — | 220 mm |
| Height | — | 90 mm |
| Depth | — | 170 mm |
| Colours | — | Silver, Black |
