- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EAZZE D1R Cube vs NeoPix 230
Aurzen EAZZE D1R Cube vs Philips NeoPix 230
What EAZZE D1R Cube does better (2) and where NeoPix 230 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture2.4
9.0Setup & placement8.6
3.9Smart features & sound3.7
Why is EAZZE D1R Cube better than NeoPix 230?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)330 lm vs 250 lm+32%
- Largest image size150″ vs 80″+88%
Why is NeoPix 230 better than EAZZE D1R Cube?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 3,000:12×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 330 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.23:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.72 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 40″ | 48″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 80″ |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Own / Linux platform | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 2.5 kg |
| Width | — | 239 mm |
| Height | — | 187 mm |
| Depth | — | 140 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
