- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EAZZE D1R Cube vs FLIK X10
Aurzen EAZZE D1R Cube vs Kodak FLIK X10
What EAZZE D1R Cube does better (4) and where FLIK X10 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Setup & placement5.2
Why is EAZZE D1R Cube better than FLIK X10?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · FLIK X10: No
- Audio outputYes · FLIK X10: No
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 800:1+88%
- Largest image size150″ vs 120″+25%
Why is FLIK X10 better than EAZZE D1R Cube?
FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 330 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 3,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | 800:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.23:1 | 1.3:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.72 m | 2.88 m |
| Smallest image size | 40″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Own / Linux platform | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | — |
