How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EAZZE D1R Cube vs NeoPix 250

Aurzen EAZZE D1R Cube vs Philips NeoPix 250

What EAZZE D1R Cube does better (3) and where NeoPix 250 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen EAZZE D1R Cube
Aurzen · 2025EAZZE D1R Cube
4.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 250
Philips · 2025NeoPix 250
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$260
2.4Picture2.2
3.9Smart features & sound2.9

Why is EAZZE D1R Cube better than NeoPix 250?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)330 lm vs 250 lm+32%
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 6 W+67%
  3. Audio outputYes · NeoPix 250: No

Why is NeoPix 250 better than EAZZE D1R Cube?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 3,000:12×
  2. Largest image size150″ vs 200″+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 250Philips NeoPix 250≈ US$2603.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
4K method—4K input only (downscaled)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)330 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.23:11.31:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.72 m2.9 m
Smallest image size40″80″
Largest image size150″200″
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformOwn / Linux platformGoogle TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Weight—2.5 kg
Width—239 mm
Height—188 mm
Depth—141 mm
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare