How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EAZZE D1R Cube vs NeoPix 450

Aurzen EAZZE D1R Cube vs Philips NeoPix 450

What EAZZE D1R Cube does better (1) and where NeoPix 450 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen EAZZE D1R Cube
Aurzen · 2025EAZZE D1R Cube
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ US$250
vs
Philips NeoPix 450
Philips · 2025NeoPix 450
5.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$320
Higher score
2.4Picture2.5
9.0Setup & placement9.7
3.9Smart features & sound4.7

Why is EAZZE D1R Cube better than NeoPix 450?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 1,000:1+50%

Why is NeoPix 450 better than EAZZE D1R Cube?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)330 lm vs 500 lm+52%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 450Philips NeoPix 450≈ US$3205.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)330 lm500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:11,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.23:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.72 m—
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size150″—
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformOwn / Linux platformGoogle TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio outputYesYes
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Weight—2.48 kg
Width—195 mm
Height—219 mm
Depth—194 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare