- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZIP vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD
Aurzen ZIP vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
What ZIP does better (0) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Picture3.0
Why is ZIP better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
ZIP has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than ZIP?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm vs 200 lm2×
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 100 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.09:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.41 m | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 1 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Battery capacity (mAh) | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Light source life | — | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.28 kg | — |
| Width | 84 mm | — |
| Height | 78 mm | — |
| Depth | 26 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Black, White |
