How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs ML750i

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Optoma ML750i

What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (0) and where ML750i wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
0 advantages
vs
Optoma ML750i
Optoma · 2025ML750i
4.6Score
6 advantages≈ US$620
Higher score
3.0Picture4.9

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than ML750i?

Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is ML750i better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 450 lm2.2×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
  3. Light source life3,500 h vs 20,000 h5.7×
  4. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1 vs 15,000:14.3×
  5. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
  6. Audio outputNo · Luma 400 tragbarer HD: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Optoma ML750iOptoma ML750i≈ US$6204.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm450 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:115,000:1
HDR support—No
3D playback—Yes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.5:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.32 m
Smallest image size—17″
Largest image size—100″
Lens shift—None
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—2 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—67 W
Light source life3,500 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—32 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—29 dB
Weight—0.4 kg
ColoursBlack, WhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare