How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZIP vs Multipic 6.1

Aurzen ZIP vs Overmax Multipic 6.1

What ZIP does better (1) and where Multipic 6.1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen ZIP
Aurzen · 2025ZIP
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ US$400
Higher score
vs
Overmax Multipic 6.1
Overmax · 2026Multipic 6.1
4 advantages≈ US$580
8.7Setup & placement4.4

Why is ZIP better than Multipic 6.1?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionYes · Multipic 6.1: No

Why is Multipic 6.1 better than ZIP?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Wi-FiNo · ZIP: Yes
  4. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen ZIPAurzen ZIP≈ US$4004.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.09:11.5:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.41 m3.32 m
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)1 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiNoYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Battery capacity (mAh)5,000 mAh—
Light source life—7,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Weight0.28 kg—
Width84 mm—
Height78 mm—
Depth26 mm—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare