How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZIP vs Multipic 8.1

Aurzen ZIP vs Overmax Multipic 8.1

What ZIP does better (2) and where Multipic 8.1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen ZIP
Aurzen · 2025ZIP
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$400
vs
Overmax Multipic 8.1
Overmax · 2025Multipic 8.1
6.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$400
Higher score
8.7Setup & placement5.6

Why is ZIP better than Multipic 8.1?

  1. AutofocusYes · Multipic 8.1: No
  2. Automatic keystone correctionYes · Multipic 8.1: No

Why is Multipic 8.1 better than ZIP?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)1 W vs 10 W10×
  2. Wi-FiNo · ZIP: Yes
  3. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
  4. Audio outputNo · ZIP: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen ZIPAurzen ZIP≈ US$4004.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)—
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)—
4K method—4K input only (downscaled)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—3,800 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—4,000:1
HDR support—No
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.09:11.07:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.41 m2.37 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size—200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYesNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)1 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiNoYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYesYes
Battery capacity (mAh)5,000 mAh—
Light source life—50,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)—29 dB
Weight0.28 kg—
Width84 mm—
Height78 mm—
Depth26 mm—
Colours—Black, Silver, Grey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare