How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZIP vs Image Pointer GP01

Aurzen ZIP vs Ricoh Image Pointer GP01

What ZIP does better (2) and where Image Pointer GP01 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen ZIP
Aurzen · 2025ZIP
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$400
Higher score
vs
Ricoh Image Pointer GP01
Ricoh · 2023Image Pointer GP01
3 advantages≈ US$400
Dimensions

Size comparison

ZIPImage Pointer GP01
84 × 782670 × 38111
ZIPImage Pointer GP01Difference
Height78 mm38 mm+40 mm
Width84 mm70 mm+14 mm
Depth26 mm111 mm−85 mm
Weight0.3 kg0.2 kg+0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ZIP better than Image Pointer GP01?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm vs 45 lm2.2×
  2. Automatic keystone correctionYes · Image Pointer GP01: No

Why is Image Pointer GP01 better than ZIP?

  1. Wi-FiNo · ZIP: Yes
  2. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
  3. Weight0.28 kg vs 0.2 kg+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen ZIPAurzen ZIP≈ US$4004.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)—
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)—
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm45 lm
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.09:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.41 m—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)1 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiNoYes
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputNo—
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYesYes
Battery capacity (mAh)5,000 mAh—
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Weight0.28 kg0.2 kg
Width84 mm70 mm
Height78 mm38 mm
Depth26 mm111 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare