How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. AK700ST vs NEBULA

BenQ AK700ST vs Nebula NEBULA

What AK700ST does better (3) and where NEBULA wins (0) — every spec side by side.

BenQ AK700ST
BenQ · 2026AK700ST
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ US$2,900
Higher score
vs
Nebula NEBULA
Nebula · 2026NEBULA
0 advantages
9.5Picture3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

AK700STNEBULA
304 × 112234183 × 230204
AK700STNEBULADifference
Height112 mm230 mm−118 mm
Width304 mm183 mm+121 mm
Depth234 mm204 mm+30 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AK700ST better than NEBULA?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 1,500 lm2.7×
  2. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Light source life20,000 h vs 1,500 h13.3×

Why is NEBULA better than AK700ST?

NEBULA has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

BenQ AK700STBenQ AK700ST≈ US$2,9008.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm1,500 lm
Native contrast ratio3,000,000:1—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,500:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
Colour gamut (Rec.709)95%—
Gaming
Input lag8.4 ms—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio0.69:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)0.83:1—
Throw typeShort throw (0.4–1.0:1)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image1.53 m—
Optical zoom1.2×—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs2—
HDMI version2—
HDMI eARCYes—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption212 W—
Light source life20,000 h1,500 h
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)29 dB—
Weight3.4 kg—
Width304 mm183 mm
Height112 mm230 mm
Depth234 mm204 mm
ColoursBlackGrey, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare