- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs AK700ST
Acer QT12 vs BenQ AK700ST
What QT12 does better (1) and where AK700ST wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is QT12 better than AK700ST?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 4,000 lm+62%
Why is AK700ST better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 20,000 h3.1×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 4,000 lm |
| Native contrast ratio | — | 3,000,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| Colour gamut (Rec.709) | — | 95% |
| Gaming | ||
| Input lag | — | 8.4 ms |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.69:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 0.83:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.53 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.2× |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 212 W |
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 32 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 29 dB |
| Weight | — | 3.4 kg |
| Width | — | 304 mm |
| Height | — | 112 mm |
| Depth | — | 234 mm |
| Colours | White | Black |
