- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH575C vs IN0024SL
BenQ TH575C vs InFocus IN0024SL
What TH575C does better (1) and where IN0024SL wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is TH575C better than IN0024SL?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · IN0024SL: No
Why is IN0024SL better than TH575C?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm vs 4,000 lm+5%
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Optical zoom1.1× vs 2×+82%
- Fan noise34 dB vs 32 dB+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,800 lm | 4,000 lm |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | 1.4:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.64:1 | 2.24:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | 3.1 m |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | 2× |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 15 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | Yes |
| VGA input | — | Yes |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 195 W |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 34 dB | 32 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 26 dB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | — |
| Width | 296 mm | — |
| Height | 120 mm | — |
| Depth | 237 mm | — |
| Colours | — | White |
