How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TH575C vs IN0046SL

BenQ TH575C vs InFocus IN0046SL

What TH575C does better (1) and where IN0046SL wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ TH575C
BenQ · 2026TH575C
1 advantage≈ US$620
vs
InFocus IN0046SL
InFocus · 2025IN0046SL
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$500
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

TH575CIN0046SL
296 × 120237236 × 96313
TH575CIN0046SLDifference
Height120 mm96 mm+24 mm
Width296 mm236 mm+60 mm
Depth237 mm313 mm−76 mm
Weight2.3 kg2.9 kg−0.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TH575C better than IN0046SL?

  1. Weight2.3 kg vs 2.9 kg+26%

Why is IN0046SL better than TH575C?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm vs 4,700 lm+24%
  2. Fan noise34 dB vs 27 dB+26%
  3. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  4. Optical zoom1.1× vs 1.3×+18%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ TH575CBenQ TH575C≈ US$620
InFocus IN0046SLInFocus IN0046SL≈ US$5005.9
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLampLamp
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm4,700 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—30,000:1
3D playbackYesYes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—85 Hz
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.49:11.19:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.64:11.54:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.3 m2.63 m
Optical zoom1.1×1.3×
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
HDMI version—1.4
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—Yes
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—267 W
Light source life—15,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise34 dB27 dB
Weight2.3 kg2.9 kg
Width296 mm236 mm
Height120 mm96 mm
Depth237 mm313 mm
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare