- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH575C vs Neopix 950
BenQ TH575C vs Philips Neopix 950
What TH575C does better (2) and where Neopix 950 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is TH575C better than Neopix 950?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm vs 1,400 lm2.7×
- Weight2.3 kg vs 4.3 kg+87%
Why is Neopix 950 better than TH575C?
- Fan noise34 dB vs 27 dB+26%
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | 3LCD |
| Light source | Lamp | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,800 lm | 1,400 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,100:1 |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.64:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | — |
| Largest image size | — | 150″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | — |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 34 dB | 27 dB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 4.3 kg |
| Width | 296 mm | — |
| Height | 120 mm | — |
| Depth | 237 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
