- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH575C vs X9
BenQ TH575C vs TOPTRO X9
What TH575C does better (1) and where X9 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is TH575C better than X9?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm vs 1,600 lm2.4×
Why is X9 better than TH575C?
X9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | Lamp | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,800 lm | 1,600 lm |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.64:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | — |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | — | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 1,600 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 34 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | — |
| Width | 296 mm | — |
| Height | 120 mm | — |
| Depth | 237 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Silver, Grey |
