- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH575C vs LX750-4KB
BenQ TH575C vs ViewSonic LX750-4KB
What TH575C does better (1) and where LX750-4KB wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TH575CLX750-4KB
| TH575C | LX750-4KB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 120 mm | 104 mm | +16 mm |
| Width | 296 mm | 312 mm | −16 mm |
| Depth | 237 mm | 234 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 3.5 kg | −1.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TH575C better than LX750-4KB?
- Weight2.3 kg vs 3.5 kg+52%
Why is LX750-4KB better than TH575C?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm vs 4,000 lm+5%
- Fan noise34 dB vs 33 dB+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,800 lm | 4,000 lm |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 240 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.64:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | — |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | — |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | — | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 34 dB | 33 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 3.5 kg |
| Width | 296 mm | 312 mm |
| Height | 120 mm | 104 mm |
| Depth | 237 mm | 234 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
