- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH575C vs PX700HDH
BenQ TH575C vs ViewSonic PX700HDH
What TH575C does better (2) and where PX700HDH wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TH575CPX700HDH
| TH575C | PX700HDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 120 mm | 115 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 296 mm | 293 mm | +3 mm |
| Depth | 237 mm | 221 mm | +16 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TH575C better than PX700HDH?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm vs 3,700 lm+3%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.4 kg+4%
Why is PX700HDH better than TH575C?
- Fan noise34 dB vs 31 dB+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,800 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 22,000:1 |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | 1.49:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.64:1 | 1.64:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | 3.3 m |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 300 W |
| Light source life | — | 6,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 34 dB | 31 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 27 dB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Width | 296 mm | 293 mm |
| Height | 120 mm | 115 mm |
| Depth | 237 mm | 221 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
