How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TH575C vs K3

BenQ TH575C vs Yaber K3

What TH575C does better (1) and where K3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

BenQ TH575C
BenQ · 2026TH575C
1 advantage≈ US$620
vs
Yaber K3
Yaber · 2024K3
9.2Score
0 advantages≈ US$500
Higher score

Why is TH575C better than K3?

  1. Weight2.3 kg vs 5.1 kg2.2×

Why is K3 better than TH575C?

K3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

BenQ TH575CBenQ TH575C≈ US$620
Yaber K3Yaber K3≈ US$5009.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLampLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—1,600 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—15,000:1
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.49:11.2:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.64:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.3 m2.66 m
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size—200″
Optical zoom1.1×—
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—36 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Design & noise
Fan noise34 dB—
Weight2.3 kg5.1 kg
Width296 mm—
Height120 mm—
Depth237 mm—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare