- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- W5800 vs LX-NZ3
BenQ W5800 vs JVC LX-NZ3
What W5800 does better (1) and where LX-NZ3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
W5800LX-NZ3
| W5800 | LX-NZ3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 145 mm | 145 mm | = |
| Width | 525 mm | 405 mm | +120 mm |
| Depth | 392 mm | 341 mm | +51 mm |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | 6.3 kg | +3.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W5800 better than LX-NZ3?
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · LX-NZ3: No
Why is LX-NZ3 better than W5800?
- Lens shiftVertical vs Vertical and horizontal
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,600 lm vs 3,000 lm+15%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- 4K method4K by pixel shifting vs Native 4K
- Weight10.1 kg vs 6.3 kg+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | Native 4K |
| Display technology | DLP | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,600 lm | 3,000 lm |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 200″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | Vertical | Vertical and horizontal |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 380 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 25,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 27 dB | — |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | 6.3 kg |
| Width | 525 mm | 405 mm |
| Height | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Depth | 392 mm | 341 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
