- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- W5800 vs UHZ68LV-W
BenQ W5800 vs Optoma UHZ68LV-W
What W5800 does better (1) and where UHZ68LV-W wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is W5800 better than UHZ68LV-W?
- Fan noise30 dB vs 31 dB+3%
Why is UHZ68LV-W better than W5800?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,600 lm vs 5,000 lm+92%
- Audio outputNo · W5800: Yes
- HDMI inputs2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,600 lm | 5,000 lm |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.92:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | — | 302″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | Vertical | Vertical |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 8 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 380 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 25,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | 31 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 27 dB | 25 dB |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | — |
| Width | 525 mm | — |
| Height | 145 mm | — |
| Depth | 392 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
