- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- BW-V5 vs NeoPix 200
BlitzWolf BW-V5 vs Philips NeoPix 200
What BW-V5 does better (3) and where NeoPix 200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is BW-V5 better than NeoPix 200?
- Light source life50,000 h vs 20,000 h2.5×
- Largest image size170″ vs 60″2.8×
- Weight1.2 kg vs 1.35 kg+13%
Why is NeoPix 200 better than BW-V5?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
- Wi-FiNo · BW-V5: Yes
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 200 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 3,800 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.35:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.99 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 24″ |
| Largest image size | 170″ | 60″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 44 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.2 kg | 1.35 kg |
| Width | 220 mm | — |
| Height | 93 mm | — |
| Depth | 190 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Silver, Black, White |
