How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. BW-V5 vs TX-177

BlitzWolf BW-V5 vs Technaxx TX-177

What BW-V5 does better (3) and where TX-177 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

BlitzWolf BW-V5
BlitzWolf · 2024BW-V5
3 advantages≈ US$150
vs
Technaxx TX-177
Technaxx · 2022TX-177
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
4.8Noise, lifetime & portability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

BW-V5TX-177
220 × 93190187 × 96234
BW-V5TX-177Difference
Height93 mm96 mm−3 mm
Width220 mm187 mm+33 mm
Depth190 mm234 mm−44 mm
Weight1.2 kg1.4 kg−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BW-V5 better than TX-177?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 3 W+67%
  2. Light source life50,000 h vs 40,000 h+25%
  3. Weight1.2 kg vs 1.36 kg+13%

Why is TX-177 better than BW-V5?

  1. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 1,500:1+50%
  3. Largest image size170″ vs 200″+18%
Specifications

Side by side

BlitzWolf BW-V5BlitzWolf BW-V5≈ US$150
Technaxx TX-177Technaxx TX-177≈ US$1306.7
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)3,800 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:11,500:1
Lens & placement
Smallest image size—50″
Largest image size170″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W3 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiNo—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—70 W
Light source life50,000 h40,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise44 dB—
Weight1.2 kg1.36 kg
Width220 mm187 mm
Height93 mm96 mm
Depth190 mm234 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare