How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Neo vs FLIK X10

Dangbei Neo vs Kodak FLIK X10

What Neo does better (2) and where FLIK X10 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Dangbei Neo
Dangbei · 2023Neo
7.5Score
2 advantages≈ US$200
Higher score
vs
Kodak FLIK X10
Kodak · 2025FLIK X10
0 advantages≈ US$240
5.3Setup & placement5.2

Why is Neo better than FLIK X10?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
  2. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · FLIK X10: No

Why is FLIK X10 better than Neo?

FLIK X10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Dangbei NeoDangbei Neo≈ US$2007.5
Kodak FLIK X10Kodak FLIK X10≈ US$240
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)540 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—3,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—800:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11.3:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m2.88 m
Smallest image size40″40″
Largest image size120″120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Obstacle avoidanceYes—
Automatic screen fitYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)12 W—
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital PlusYes—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformOwn / Linux platform—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Internal storage8 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption75 W—
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise22 dB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare